Computational Thinking: Everything You Need to Know

In paraphrasing Jeannette M. Wing’s definition of computational thinking, it deals with providing solutions to complex problems, creating effective systems, and having a good understanding of how humans behave. This process involves actively utilizing the central concepts of computer science and comprises a wide assortment of intellectual tools which echo the extensiveness of computer science as a field.

It is pertinent to delineate computational thinking from what it is not. For example, although it is typically confused with programming/coding, this is not the entirety of computational thinking. It is an evolving model that can even be carried out without using a computer.

The International Society for Technology in Education has already pinpointed that as soon as teachers see how much computational thinking can be utilized outside the definite usage of computers, it will be catalytic in learning and promoting curiosity among growing students.

Computational thinking has four subsets: decomposition, pattern recognition, algorithms, and abstraction. Together, these valuable areas form the benefits of computational thinking. These benefits include:

Decomposition: This subset of computational thinking is all about taking things apart. Budding engineers may delight in finding this mindset’s hands-on applications as they develop and grow their comprehension of complicated materials one step at a time. Kids, who’re this kind of learners, may join a robotics club at school. Outside of STEM, decomposition skills become useful when tackling societal issues, learning a new language, and comprehending the far-reaching effects of historical events.

Pattern recognition: Programmers utilize pattern recognition all the time to identify the most effective means of solving problems, and it’s crucial to fields like artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science. Insightful, efficient pattern recognition is beneficial to children, whether they’re leveling up their chess game or enhancing the user experience of the latest app.

Algorithms: Algorithm design is all about identifying the fastest and most streamlined means of accomplishing the desired result. They organize pieces of information so that they can be put to the most effective application, such as finding exactly what a person is looking for in Google. Learning about coding algorithms is a wonderful way to begin exploring computer science.

Abstraction: In the context of computational thinking, abstraction means focusing only on the most important elements of an idea. Whether in editing a written masterpiece or perfecting a line of code, abstraction comes in handy when children need to focus without concentrating on small details.

Children will become more effective critical thinkers, planners, communicators, and problem-solvers by developing their computational thinking.

17 Ways to Teach Students How to Move from One Math Operation to Another

Are you looking for ways to teach students to move from one math operation to the next? If so, keep reading.

1. Give the learner apps or a hand-held educational device that requires them to solve an assortment of math problems.

2. Give the learner self-checking learning materials to reinforce solving problems correctly.

3. Acknowledge quality work (e.g., display the learner’s work, congratulate the learner, etc.).

4. Minimize the amount of information on a page (e.g., fewer problems, less print, etc.) if it is causing visual distractions for the learner.

5. Minimize the number of problems on a page (e.g., five problems to a page with the learner required to do four pages of problems throughout the day).

6. Praise the learner for correctly changing from one math operation to another: (a) give the learner a concrete reward (e.g., privileges such as leading the line, handing out learning materials, 10 minutes of free time, etc.) or (b) give the learner an informal reward (e.g., praise, handshake, smile, etc.).

7. Make the learner go through math assignments and highlight or otherwise mark the operation of each problem before starting to solve the math problems.

8. Complete the first problem or two of a math assignment for the learner so they know that operation to use.

9. Converse with the learner to explain (a) what they are doing wrong (e.g., adding instead of subtracting) and (b) what they must be doing (e.g., adding addition problems, subtracting subtraction problems, etc.).

10. Teach the learner instruction-following skills: (a) listen carefully, (b) ask questions, (c) use environmental signals, (d) rely on examples given, and ( e) wait until all instructions have been given before beginning.

11. Utilize a separate piece of paper for each math operation (i.e., place problems with the same operation on the same piece of paper). As the learner shows success, slowly introduce problems with various operations on the same page.

12. Utilize a written reminder beside each math problem to indicate that operation is to be used (e.g., division, addition, subtraction, etc.). As the learner shows success, slowly lessen the use of reminders.

13. Color-code the operation symbol for each math problem (e.g., make addition signs green, subtraction signs red, etc.). As the learner shows success, slowly lessen the use of color-coding.

14. Utilize visual signals (e.g., stop signs or red dots) on the learner’s paper when they must change operations. Get the learner to raise their hand when reaching stop signs and give the learner instructions for the next problem.

15. Consider using Alexa for the Math Classroom.

16. Try gamifying your math lessons.

17. Consider using one of the apps and tools from our many math app lists:

9 Must-Have Apps and Tools for Kids Who Hate Math

10 Apps to Teach Preschoolers Math

20 Math Apps for Students of All Ages

Advanced Math Apps, Tools, and Resources for That We Love

Elementary School Math Apps, Tools, and Resources That We Love

Fraction Apps, Tools, and Resources That We Love

High School Math Apps, Tools, and Resources That We Love

Interactive Math for the Google Classroom

Math Apps, Tools, and Resources That I Would Use If I Were Still in the Classroom

Math Manipulatives Apps, Tools, and Resources That We Love

Middle School Math Apps, Tools, and Resources That We Love

Multiplication Apps, Tools, and Resources That We Love

PreK Math Apps, Tools, and Resources That We Love 

YouTube Channels for the Math Classroom

19 Ways to Encourage Students to Behave Appropriately in the Presence of Other Educators

Are you looking for ways to encourage students to behave appropriately in the presence of other educators? If so, keep reading.

1. Make sure that the substitute authority figure is familiar with the behavioral support system used in the classroom (e.g., rules, point system, reinforcers, etc.).

2. Connect directly with the substitute authority figure, if possible, to disseminate information that will contribute to the learner’s success.

3. Select a learner(s) to be an assistant to the substitute authority figure during the day’s learning activities (e.g., the learner(s) gives accurate information about the schedule of learning activities, behavioral support system, etc.).

4. Give the substitute authority figure detailed information on the learning activities and tasks.

5. Make sure the substitute authority figure follows all procedures indicated by the classroom teacher (e.g., academic learning activities, behavioral support system, etc.).

6. Get the substitute authority figure to give a written review of the day as feedback for the classroom teacher (e.g., learning activities finished, learner behavior, absences, incidents about individual students, etc.).

7. Designate special or unique duties to be performed by other staff members in the school building (e.g., administering medication, feeding, toileting, etc.).

8. Get the learner to record their behavior when a substitute authority figure is in the classroom.

9. Select a peer to work with the learner to model appropriate behavior and to give information appropriate for success for the learner.

10. If an aide works in the classroom, have the aide monitor the learner’s behavior, give reinforcement, deliver instructions, etc.

11. If there is an aide in the classroom, have the aide work with the learner on a one-to-one basis throughout the day.

12. Give the learner an individualized schedule of daily activities. The schedule should be attached to the learner’s desk or carried with them at all times.

13. Train the substitute authority figure to interact with the learner regularly to give reinforcement, deliver instructions, give encouragement, etc.

14. Get the substitute authority figure to keep visibility to and from the learner. The substitute authority figure should be able to see the learner; the learner should be able to see the substitute authority figure. Make eye contact possible at all times.

15. Give the learner as many high interest learning activities as possible.

16. Consider using a classroom management app. Click here to view a list of apps that we recommend.

17. Consider using an adaptive behavior management app. Click here to view a list of apps that we recommend.

18. Consider using Alexa to help the student learn to behave appropriately. Click here to read an article that we wrote on the subject.

19. Click here to learn about six bonus strategies for challenging problem behaviors and mastering classroom management.

How to Effectively Use Common Planning Time

pass or fail

In schools, common planning time refers to any period scheduled during the school day for several educators, or teams of educators, to work on grading and lesson planning. In most cases, common planning time is considered a form of professional development. Its primary purpose is to bring educators together to learn from one another and collaborate on projects to improve lesson quality and teaching effectiveness and learner achievement.

These improvements result from (1) the improved communication that occurs among educators who meet and talk regularly, (2) the insights and constructive feedback that happen during professional discussions among educators, and (3) the curriculum and resources that are created or improved when educators work on them collaboratively.

While the term suggests that the main activity of common planning time is “planning,” the time may be devoted to a broad variety of activities.

The following are a few examples of what generally takes place during common planning time:

Examining educator work: Teachers may collaboratively review lesson plans or assessments before being used in class and then offer feedback and recommendations for improvement.

Examining learner work: Teachers may look at examples of learner work turned in for a class and then offered recommendations on how lessons may be modified to improve learning and learner work quality.

Examining learner data: Teachers may analyze learner-performance data from a class to find trends—such as which learners are consistently failing or underperforming—and collaboratively develop proactive teaching and support strategies to help learners struggling academically. By discussing the learners they have in common, educators can develop a stronger understanding of certain learners’ specific learning needs and capabilities, helping them coordinate and improve how they are taught.

Examining Education Research: Teachers may select a text to read, such as a research study or an article about a specialized teaching strategy, and then engage in a conversation about the text and how it can help inform their teaching strategies or practices.

Developing curriculum: Teachers may collaboratively work on lesson plans, assignments, projects, and new classes, such as an interdisciplinary class taught by two educators from distinct subject areas (for example, an art-history class taught by an art educator and a history educator). Teachers may also plan or develop other learning experiences, such as capstone projects, demonstrations of learning, learning pathways, personal learning plans, or portfolios, for example.

Benefits and Challenges of Common Planning Time

The common planning time concept is not usually an object of debate. Still, skeptics may question whether the time will positively impact learner learning, whether educators will utilize the time purposefully and productively, or whether learners would be better served if they spent more time teaching.

Since it’s often extremely challenging, from a research perspective, to attribute gains in learner performance to anyone’s influence in a school, the benefits of common planning time may be challenging to measure objectively and reliably.

However, common planning time will be debated when the time is poorly used, when meetings become disorganized and unfocused, when educators have negative experiences during meetings, and when the practice is perceived as a burdensome requirement.

Like any school-improvement strategy or program, the design and execution quality will usually decide the results achieved. If meetings are poorly organized and operated, and conversations lapse into complaints about policies, or if educators fail to turn group learning into changes in teaching strategies, common planning time is less likely to be successful.

Benefits

Advocates of common planning time believe that it can foster and promote a broad variety of professional interactions and practices among educators in a school. For instance:

  • Teachers may volunteer for leadership responsibility or feel a more profound investment in a school-improvement initiative.
  • Teachers may feel more confident and better equipped to address their learners’ learning needs, and they may become more willing to participate in the type of self-reflection that leads to professional growth.
  • The school culture may improve, and collegial relationships can become better and more trusting if the faculty interacts and communicates more productively.
  • Teachers may participate in professional collaborations more often, such as co-creating and co-teaching interdisciplinary classes.
  • More teaching innovation may take hold in classes and educational programs, and educators may begin incorporating efficient teaching strategies that are being used by colleagues.
  • Teachers may begin utilizing more evidence-based approaches to constructing lessons and delivering instruction.

Challenges

When implementing common planning time, administrators and educators may encounter several challenges that could give rise to criticism or debate. For instance:

  • Competing duties and logistical challenges can make the scheduling of regular common planning time challenging. Insufficient meeting time or randomly scheduled time may then undermine the strategy and its potential benefits.
  • A scarcity of school leaders’ support could lead to an inadequate investment of time,  resources, and attention.
  • Poor training for group facilitators could produce ineffective facilitation, disorganized meetings, and an erosion of confidence in the strategy.
  • A scarcity of clear goals for common planning time can lead to unfocused conversations, misspent time, and general confusion about the meeting’s purpose.
  • A negative school or faculty culture can lead to tensions, conflicts, factions, and other issues that undermine the common planning time’s potential benefits.
  • A lack of observable, measurable progress, or learner-achievement gains can erode support, motivation, and enthusiasm for the strategy.
  • Divergent educational philosophies or learning styles can create disagreements that threaten the collegiality and idea of shared purpose usually required to make common planning time successful.

The Edvocate’s Guide to Learning Outcomes

Student outcomes denote what learners will know or accomplish once they finish a class or program of study. Learning outcomes are descriptions of the capabilities, skills, and knowledge used to assess learner learning. Learning outcomes should outline what learners possess and show upon completing a learning experience or set of experiences. When creating a list of learner learning outcomes for educators to set as curriculum objectives to improve learner learning, contemplate the following recommendations:

How to Build Student Learning Outcomes

Choose between 3-5 learning outcomes: You should select acceptable learning outcomes to ensure learner progress can be measured without becoming complicated for educators to assess. Not all learning experiences will assess all learning outcomes. Each educational activity can assess learners’ development and comprehension, focusing on 1-2 learner learning objectives. Less than three objectives likely means that the learner learning objectives are not robust enough for an entire class.

Learning outcomes should be simple: The outcomes identified in your plan should be concise. They should avoid compound statements that connect more than one statement to communicate efficiently. Each learning outcome should focus on creating one skill or meeting one goal, be straightforward and ensure efficient knowledge acquisition.

Learning outcomes should be written in the future tense: It is essential for the proper implementation of learner learning outcomes to be expressed in the future tense. The statement should express what a personal learner should do in regard to specific instruction or an educational activity. Outcomes should be observable to be quantified for examining crucial learner success metrics through learning assessment. They should create and use information literacy skills.

Learning outcomes should be realistic: to ensure learner learning outcomes are successful, they must be attainable for the learners for whom they are designated. Outcomes need to be designed with learners’ ability, initial skill sets, cognitive development, and the institutional time frame’s length to attain these skill sets in mind. Further, they should also align with the content being taught to learners.

Learning outcomes should align with the school curriculum: The learning outcomes developed should be consistent with the objectives (curriculum) within the program and discipline in which they are taught. This is especially essential when interpreting assessment results to analyze where changes in instruction should be made. Curriculum mapping is one example of an efficient way to ensure that chosen learning outcomes correspond to the designated curriculum. A curriculum map is a visual plan that explains which learning outcomes are plotted against specific program classes. This ensures that learning goals are reached promptly.

What did we miss?

The Edvocate’s Guide to Developing Learning Objectives

Learning objectives are brief statements that explain what learners will be expected to learn by the end of the school year, class, unit, lesson, project, or class period. Sometimes, learning objectives are the interim educational goals that educators establish for learners who are working toward meeting more comprehensive learning standards.

Defining the learning objective is complicated because educators utilize a broad variety of terms for learning objectives. These words may or may not be used synonymously from place to place. For instance, the terms student learning objective, benchmark, grade-level indicator, learning target, performance indicator, and learning standard may refer to specific learning objectives in educational contexts. Educators also create a broad variety of homegrown terms for learning objectives, which further complicates things.

Learning Objective Functions

While educators utilize learning objectives in distinct ways to achieve various teaching goals, the concept is closely related to learning progressions, or the sequencing of educational expectations across several developmental stages, ages, or grade levels. Learning objectives are a good way for educators to structure and sequence what students are to learn. They plan out learning goals for a specific teaching period, usually to move learners toward achieving bigger, longer-term educational goals such as meeting class learning expectations, passing on a standardized test, or graduating from high school ready for what’s next.

Learning objectives are a key strategy in proficiency-based learning, which refers to systems of instruction, assessment, grading, and educational reporting based on learners demonstrating understanding of the skills they are expected to learn before they move to the next lesson or receive a diploma.

Learning objectives are being used in educators’ job-performance evaluations, and the term learner learning objectives are associated with this practice in many states.

Learning objectives are also a way to create and articulate educational expectations for learners to know precisely what is expected of them. When learning objectives are communicated to learners, the reasoning goes, learners will be more likely to achieve the goals. When learning objectives are absent or unclear, learners may not know what’s expected of them, leading to confusion or other factors that could impede the learning process.

Types of Learning Objectives

While the terminology, structure, and utilization of learning objectives can differ in different school districts and states, the following are a few of the significant forms that learning objectives take:

School-year or grade-level objectives: Learning objectives may be synonymous with learning standards, which are concise, written descriptions of the things that learners should know and do at a specific stage of their education. Grade-level learning objectives explain what learners should achieve academically by the end of a particular grade level or grade span.

Course or program objectives: Teachers may also decide on learning objectives for classes or other educational programs, such as summer-school programs. The objectives may be the same educational goals described in learning standards or explain interim goals.

Unit or project objectives: Teachers may decide learning objectives for teaching units, which usually comprise a series of lessons focused on a topic or common theme, such as a historical period. In the case of project-based learning—a teaching approach that utilizes multifaceted projects as a central organizing strategy for educating learners—educators may decide learning objectives for the end of long-term projects rather than a unit.

Lesson or class-period objectives: Teachers may also articulate learning objectives for specific lessons that compose a unit, project, or class. They may decide learning objectives for each day they train learners (in this case, the term learning target is often used). For instance, educators may write a set of daily learning objectives on the blackboard or post them to an online class management system to know what the learning expectations are for a particular class period. In this case, learning objectives move learners progressively toward meeting more broad learning goals for a unit or class.

Framing Learning Objectives

In practice, educators will commonly express learning objectives to achieve distinct teaching goals or encourage learners to think about the learning process in a specific way.

The following are several ways that learning objectives may be framed or expressed by educators:

Descriptive statements: Objectives may be expressed as terse statements describing what learners should know by the end of a defined teaching period. For instance: State learning standards, which can include various learning objectives, are commonly expressed as descriptive statements.

“I can” statements: Teachers may select to express learning objectives as “I can” statements as a way to conceptualize the objectives from a learner’s perspective. The idea is that “I can” statements encourage learners to connect with the learning goals and experience a greater personal accomplishment idea when the learning objectives are achieved. 

“Learners will be able to” statements: These statements are a common format for learning objectives, and the abbreviation SWBAT may be used in lieu of the entire phrase.

Implementing the Four Parts of Explicit Instruction

Are you a teacher who is new to explicit instruction and needs help implementing it in your classroom? Then you have come to the right place. This article will tell you how to implement the four parts of explicit instruction into your classroom.

1. Model with clear explanations.

How: Explain or show the skill in the same way learners will practice it. Focus on the critical parts of the content you are teaching.

Why: When expectations are clear, it takes out the guesswork from learning. Plus, some learners may need to see a model several times. To decide if that’s necessary, check for comprehension by asking learners to help you do an example.

Planning Tips

  • Make sure the skill you select to teach matches the learning outcome.
  • Write a clear, concise explanation of the skill in your lesson plan.
  • Double-check that your explanation includes each of the steps.
  • Plan for several examples.
  • Model the examples in the same way learners will practice it.
  • Place a note in your plan to check for learners’ understanding periodically.

2. Express your thinking process.

How: While you are modeling, do a think-aloud of what’s happening in your mind. If you compare fractions, you may discuss how you recognized that the denominators are different. You might say, “I notice these 2 denominators are different. In this fraction, the denominator is a 6, but in this fraction, the denominator is a 5.”

Why: Learners who learn and think differently often don’t know how to begin a task or what to do when they’re stuck. Modeling self-talk can be helpful for these learners.

Planning Tips

  • Script how you will express your thinking. Don’t write out everything, but it’s essential to have your most essential points planned.
  • Think of places where learners might get stuck. Plan how you’ll work through those tricky areas.

3. Provide chances to practice.

How: During guided practice, you may work through many problems as a class and either pre-correct or correct errors as they happen. Guided practice is your chance to ensure that every step is clear to learners so that they are ready to work independently. If learners haven’t grasped the skill, you can model or verbalize it again.

Once learners are successful with guided practice, move forward with independent practice.  Resist the urge to introduce difficult content. Instead, focus on independent practice assignments that align with the skill you modeled. Learners should master the assignments during independent practice about 90 percent of the time.

After independent practice, perform a cumulative review of learned skills. The review will help learners gain and retain automaticity with the skills.

Why: Learners need to practice a skill for it to remain in their long-term memory. Guided and independent practice and cumulative review can help this process.

Planning Tips

  • Plan enough time for several chances to practice.

For guided practice:

  • Plan practice activities that students will be successful with.
  • Script your prompts, and remember that you may need to adjust your script at the moment to meet learners’ needs.

For independent practice:

  • Review expectations and the resources learners will utilize before beginning.
  • Design chances that you feel learners will be able to work on without support.

Use several ways of getting learner responses during practice to check the learner’s understanding. For instance:

  • Plan for verbal responses, such as choral responses.
  • Plan for written responses, such as “stop and jot” or writing a response on dry-erase boards.
  • Plan for physical responses, such as nonverbal signals.

Cumulative review:

  • Identify the set of skills necessary to meet the learning goals.
  • Plan strategies to review previously taught skills that ladder up to the new skills you’re teaching.
  • Plan strategies to review the newly acquired skills or info.
  • Keep the cumulative review brief and focused.

4. Give feedback.

How: As your learners engage in guided and independent practice, give them immediate and actionable feedback.

Why: A quick response will guide learners to success and will reduce the chance that they’ll practice a skill or strategy with errors.

Planning Tips

  • Make a note of times in the lesson when you’ll be able to move about the room to make informal observations of learners.
  • Attach a sheet of paper with your learners’ names to a clipboard.
  • Leave time to deliver specific feedback to each learner.
  • Write a note in your plan to analyze learner data after the lesson. You’ll want to utilize the data to make decisions about what instruction a learner needs next.

An Overview of Explicit Instruction

Have you ever attempted to follow a new recipe, only to identify that a step is missing or unclear? Or maybe the directions had too much info for your brain to process.  The same thing can happen when your learners learn something new. Some learners can make inferences to figure out the next steps or to work through ambiguity. But for learners who learn and think differently, one unclear direction or having too many things to remember can be a deal-breaker.

That’s why it’s so essential to make sure your instruction is as clear and complete as it can be. One way to accomplish this is to utilize explicit instruction. This is a way to deliver direct, structured instruction to learners—from kindergartners to high-schoolers. It makes lessons crystal clear and shows learners how to start and succeed in a task. You can utilize explicit instruction with your whole class. Or you can utilize it to pre-teach or re-teach a skill to one learner or a group of learners.

Why Use Explicit Instruction?

Explicit instruction is a well-researched, highly efficient teaching strategy. It can be beneficial to both learners and educators.

It makes inquiry-based learning easier. Explicit instruction gives learners who are usually left out of inquiry-based learning the info and skills they need to engage. Explicit instruction can also teach learners the processes needed for inquiry-based learning. Explicit instruction isn’t just for basic educational skills. Learners often need explicit modeling and feedback on higher-order skills like decision making and social skills.

There’s less of a load on working memory. Learners who learn and think differently often have trouble with working memory. For example, they may struggle to understand the idea of a long series of directions. Explicit instruction breaks learning up into smaller chunks, lightening the “cognitive load.”  That frees up learners’ working memory, which is essential because learning skills require a lot of working memory.

Attention issues become less of a barrier. Without explicit instruction, learners who struggle with attention may not attend to the most important ideas in a lesson. With explicit instruction, you cue learners into the essential info.

It helps overcome language barriers. When you utilize consistent and clear language in each step of instruction, students aren’t overwhelmed with managing new language demands. Explicit instruction is correlated with increased achievement gains among ELLs.  

It allows for various degrees of practice. Explicit instruction is also efficient for learners who need intensive intervention. In your school district, you may call this support “Tier 3 intervention.” These learners need to practice a skill 10 to 30  times more than their peers. Explicit instruction can give them those chances. It also provides you with a structure to make sure learners are capable and successful as they practice.

It allows data collection and analysis. Each time learners practice a skill, you have a chance to collect data. After the explicit instruction cycle, you can utilize that data to plan your next lesson, whether re-teaching or moving on to the next skill progression. This info helps you meet the needs of each learner and be nimble in your curriculum development.