Mississippi K-12 Education on its Way Up?

Last year Carey Wright was named Superintendent of Education in my home state of Mississippi. With a long list of qualifications, including a consulting gig with the Public Education Leadership Project at Harvard University, Wright brings a lot of expertise and knowledge to a state whose school system consistently ranks as one of the lowest in the nation. Before being named to this newest position, Wright worked in high-level educational positions in Maryland and the District of Columbia — both areas with different educational struggles and demographics than Mississippi. So what will Wright have in front of her in this new position?

Where Mississippi is Now

Though statistics only tell a surface story of K-12 education in Mississippi, they are certainly a starting point. Wright faces an uphill battle when it comes to educational achievement for K-12 students in Mississippi that includes these facts:

• Mississippi has the highest poverty rate and the lowest income in the nation. Clearly these numbers impact the level of education K-12 students achieve and their attitudes toward learning.
• Single-parent families account for 46 percent of the households in Mississippi. As a result, schools serve as a place for learning beyond what is found in a textbook.
• Mississippi is the only Southern state with no pre-Kindergarten program. It is one of only 11 states lacking this helpful early childhood stepping stone.
• The majority of MIssissippi residents are white, but only 44 percent of public students are white. Many of the white K-12 students in the state attend private schools that were put in place when desegregation began.
• The high school dropout rate for Mississippi sits at 26 percent. Of those, 32 percent are black students and 25 percent are Hispanic students. White students account for just 18 percent of the dropout rate in the state.
• Over one-third of the jobs in Mississippi are considered “low wage.” To raise the economic bar for this generation of K-12 students the state will need to vastly improve its educational achievements to feed a skilled workforce.

To succeed, Wright will need to understand how all of the academic statistics interact with the domestic numbers and find solutions that work better for all K-12 students in the state.

More choices

In early 2013, Mississippi lawmakers made history by passing charter school legislation that allows for the approval of up to 15 new charters in the state every year. The law followed intense lobbying by former Florida Governor Jeb Bush who is the chairman for the Foundation for Excellence in Education, a group that pushes for more school choice options and heightened accountability. The new legislation is the first of its kind in Mississippi and proponents hope that it tears down the color barrier in classrooms that continues to plague the state almost 40 years after the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed segregation by law. Wright will need to navigate the waters of new legislation and ensure accountability on the part of charter schools to insist that they serve their intended purpose in the state.

What’s ahead?

Wright certainly has her work cut out for her. To reform the public K-12 in Mississippi, she will need to break down walls in classrooms that have existed since the earliest days of public schools in the state. There is no reason that Mississippi should be viewed as a lost cause when it comes to K-12 achievement and I say that partially out of loyalty but also from a practical standpoint. The first step toward change is recognition that it needs to take place. Recent legislation and the appointment of Wright encourage me that the state of K-12 education in Mississippi today will look much differently in another decade, and for the better.

Do you think Mississippi has a legitimate chance to vastly improve K-12 achievement on Wright’s watch?

Why Voucher Systems Fail

**The Edvocate is pleased to publish guest posts as way to fuel important conversations surrounding a P-20 education in America. The opinions contained within guest posts are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of The Edvocate or Dr. Matthew Lynch.**

Slate has the following article on Sweeden’s school voucher system and its failings .I have a few thoughts on this. The Slate author seems to be amazed that a generally left-wing country like Sweden could adopt a voucher system. To the extent that Americans…

Continue reading “Why Voucher Systems Fail”

Is “School Choice” an Anti-Public School Sentiment?

There are a lot more options for receiving K-12 education today than when I was growing up. Long gone are the days when parents had to pick between the public school in their district or paying pricey private school tuition out of pocket. The rise of public charter and magnet schools, state-led voucher programs, online learning, and homeschooling options has meant that parents now have no reason to settle on the closest school or pay a premium to avoid it.

Do so many options undermine the purpose of public schools though? Should all of the energy that is going into building, naming and analyzing these other schools really be channeled into strengthening the basic schools that the government gave us?

In theory, I suppose there is an argument for refocus of educational pursuits where schools already exist, instead of creating new versions. But that theory hinges on the false assumption that given the chance, public schools would find the motivation, both within and outside school walls, to improve. Since the 1918 decree that all American children must attend at least elementary school, public schools have been considered a basic right. That widespread access certainly led to a better educated public but in the process the privilege of learning has been lost.

Despite spending more on public education than France, Germany, Canada, Australia, Japan, Brazil AND the U.K. combined, the U.S. lags behind these nations in math and science. Only 25 percent of high school graduates have the literacy skills they need to get a job. What’s more, every 26 seconds a U.S. student drops out of high school. In the democratization of education process, indifference to learning has risen and the standards at public schools have dropped.

Enter school choice – a movement that strives to improve education at ALL schools through the old-fashioned business concept of competition. Public charter and magnet schools are tuition free, just like public schools, but must make some promises in their contracts in order to stay open. If these schools of choice habitually do not reach their goals, they close. Can the same be said of public schools? The accountability level that these young additions to the public school arena bring ensures that students achieve more – and if they don’t, those schools do not stick around long.

School choice is not simply about non-traditional public schools though. The movement goes much deeper than that and empowers parents to take the reins of their children’s learning paths. Since 2007, the number of K-12 students enrolled in online public schools has risen an astonishing 450 percent. Home schooling is also on the rise as 1.77 million K-12 students are homeschooled – a number that has more than doubled since 1999.  Parents are pushing back against simple acceptance of educational opportunities based on geography; they are still choosing traditional public and private schools but only after educating themselves.

At the end of January, National School Choice Week will take place. Last year, there were over 3,600 independently-held School Choice events across the country meant to celebrate choice in education.  Parents, administrators, politicians, students and other community leaders are encouraged to hold rallies, open houses or other events to shine the spotlight on choice in K-12 education.

Traditional public schools are not excluded from the events and are an important part of the discussion. It is meant to be a time of K-12 enlightenment, when misconceptions about choice in education are resolved.

So can public schools thrive in a school choice environment? I think so, yes. Options like charter, magnet, private, online and homeschool curricula are not meant to undermine the nation’s public schools but to build them up through shared quality standards. There is room for all choices in K-12 schools and students benefit from the options.

What is your stance on school choice?

Can charter schools fix education in America?

**The Edvocate is pleased to publish guest posts as way to fuel important conversations surrounding P-20 education in America. The opinions contained within guest posts are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of The Edvocate or Dr. Matthew Lynch.**

A guest post by Ashley Catt 

Most would agree that our education system is of utmost importance in the U.S. Yearly we spend $810 billion on education, yet lag behind our counterparts at 17th in reading and 32nd in math globally.

With the amount of assets spent on education, no child should be left behind. Unfortunately, the figures tell a different story. Studies illustrate that both Hispanic and African American students are graduating 10-15 points below the national average. Additionally, 66 percent of students leave eighth grade without the comprehension of grade level math and reading.

Over the last five years, numerous studies have illustrated that charter schools prepare students better than traditional public schools. These public schools advertise innovative environments that allow both teachers and students to thrive. Supporters say that charter schools provide opportunities that foster ways to effectively interact and engage every type of learner.

Teachers are one of the most important factors in the education equation. U.S. primary school teachers work the same amount of hours as the average full-time employee, but that is only the time “on the clock.” Given that many teachers work a 10-month schedule, this illustrates the length of days and the amount of work being put in over the weekend and during summer months. Teachers must also have access to proper professional development and coaching opportunities. This will not only benefit the teachers and students simultaneously, but also lead to a more engaged and proficient workforce overall.

The culture of education in America is shifting and alternatives to traditional public schools are being pursued by parents. With fresh technologies and applications, charter schools are on the rise.

To make an impact and alter children’s lives for the better, high quality education options need to be present. Changes in American education must catch up to match the demands of the global marketplace. Are charter schools that answer?

You tell me.

____

Ashley Catt is a marketer who lives in Indianapolis.