Creating and writing lesson plans are activities common to basic teacher education courses. Before entering a classroom, young educators are taught how to meticulously plan their time for the benefit of their students.
Through online collaboration though, many teachers now take a different approach to lesson planning than even a decade ago, and it has stirred up some controversy from both sides of the aisle.
Buying or borrowing lesson plans
The most obvious way that teachers avoid the traditional lesson planning concept is by finding ideas, or even entire plans, online. This shortcut can be as simple as finding an in-class activity idea on Pinterest or as complex as downloading a grading period’s worth of lessons that are grade-appropriate. Critics of this type of planning cite ethical issues, saying that a teachers’ lesson plans should always be original. Creating these plans is simply part of the job and should never be outsourced.
Even if teachers spend just a few hours per week on lesson plans, that is a few hours of time that educators could feasibly be doing something else. The internet has made so many other professions more efficient – shouldn’t teaching benefit too? If sharing lesson plans cuts out some of the non-student interaction time, then maybe that is a cause worth getting behind.
Selling lesson plans
It’s well-known that the teaching profession is not a get-rich-quickly (or ever, really) way to earn a living. Some educators are finding ways to earn some extra income: by writing and selling lesson plans. A teacher who spoke with the New York Times said that she brings in an additional $36,000 annually from selling her original lesson plans on websites like Teachers Pay Teachers. On one hand, if teachers are developing something that is both useful to other professionals and boosts their own bottom line, why not? As long as these lesson plans are carefully vetted and that the teacher on the receiving end does due diligence to check the accuracy, what’s the big deal? In this context, selling lesson plans can be compared to people who knit or sew and sell their patterns online for others to buy and use. The buyer can make customization changes based on preference and knitting or sewing style, but if the end result turns out the way it is supposed to, everyone wins.
It is not that simple though. According to the Copyright Act of 1976, when teachers complete lesson plans for their classrooms, those materials are technically owned by the schools. Along that line of thinking, a lesson plan then sold to other teachers infringes on the inherent copyright of that material. Legalities aside, should a teacher who is already being paid to write a lesson plan for his or her own classroom then “double dip” and make even more revenue on it?
And what about teachers who keep the lesson plans they write for their classrooms and the ones they write on a freelance basis separate? Shouldn’t these teachers be able to do both things, as long as their primary teaching job does not suffer?
This is an area where it seems like teachers are expected to live up to an impossibly higher standard than other professions. By common cultural standards, any lucrative activity outside classroom hours is deemed a distraction to the purpose of teaching children. How, though, is making a little extra cash and therefore being a little more satisfied with a teaching salary really that bad? Why does it bother so many people, inside and outside the teaching industry, when teachers find a way to get ahead?
What is your take? Do you buy or sell lesson plans – or do you find either ethically wrong?
Read all of our posts about EdTech and Innovation by clicking here.
As long as a teachers consents to sell the lesson plans they took the time to create, I don’t see anything wrong with it. If teachers have great success and innovative ideas, I think sharing those brilliant ideas is a good thing.
While many years ago, some may have thought it was wrong to not writ your own lesson plans, I think it’s fine. Teachers are underpaid – if some can make more money off of selling lesson plans, why not?
I think sites like Teachers Pay Teachers are great for education community. Teachers are helping teachers! Their profession is one that is busy and underpaid. I think it’s okay that some teachers elect to pay others for their lesson plans.
Lesson plans prepared by others provide opportunities to enrich and innovate teaching. Nothing wrong in compensation for investment. Many of the lessons I taught were initially written by others and I adjusted them to my needs and goals.
I must come down on the side of another underpaid group: education writers.
As a writer of educational materials, federal law and professional ethics prevent me reusing for any purpose any materials I was paid to write for a client. The US Copyright office makes clear even in its description of fees, that no work done for hire, i.e, done as part of one’s job duties, can be copyrighted. (The language is here: https://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html) Moreover, even using something as a work sample requires the written consent of the employer for whom the work was done.
There is a second issue that is never mentioned that ought to be explored. Public education is sorely in need of additional funds. The federal law says schools own the copyrights to works made by employees as part of their job responsibilities. There’s nothing aside from the curse of “we’ve never done that before” to prevent schools from selling those lesson plans themselves. The $36,000 one teacher made in one year selling what I would argue is stolen property would go a long way toward paying the salary of another teacher.